Monday, February 28, 2011

India – England match re-ignited the spirit of World cup cricket and Tie result definitely brought smiles to everyone’s face. Obviously we would put a question, ‘Who would walk happy at the end of the match?’ and I know for sure, it’s not the captain of either side. Every Indian fan would mention that our bowlers have not backed up brilliant batting display of Sachin. But then, England tail-enders definitely tried hard to back up Strauss’ masterpiece effort. Let’s take out the power play 3 in both the innings and look at this match. We will find the bat dominating the ball to such an extent; even the lead bowlers in both the teams were clueless to stop the run flow. Anderson and Swann for England looked ordinary and same is the case with Zaheer and Harbhajan for India. I am not discounting the fact that Sachin and Strauss played a classy innings. If Sachin’s innings was chanceless, Strauss’ innings was priceless, as he did it while chasing 339.

Power play 3 was the factor that made the match a nail biter. If Bresnan’s spell ensured that England had to chase 20 runs less than what would India have posted originally, Zaheer’s spell in 3rd Power play pushed England to chase down the target only in the 50th over. As our captain rightly pointed out in the post match interview that England would have finished the match by 48th over. Dhoni had a plan for 3rd power play, which is to bowl his lead bowlers and pick up wickets so that it would be hard for new batsmen to strike good as soon as they step in. It paid rich dividends, as Zaheer picked up Bell and Strauss in successive deliveries and Collingwood in next over. Harbhajan did his part when he picked up Matt prior who was made to slog, as run rate was climbing high. It would be harsh on Chawla if we attribute the tie result to his lapse with the ball in his last over. It’s his first world cup match and he will mature.

UDRS threw a surprise in the match for the viewers, as Ian Bell was given not out LBW by the third umpire stating that he had advanced 2.5 meters down the pitch and technology’s prediction was not conclusive. My argument against the ‘2.5 meter’ would be that it should be considered situation specific. If only a fast bowler had bowled such a delivery, going by the logic that fast bowlers extract more bounce than slow bowlers, there could be doubts where in the benefit of doubt should go to the batsmen. But if it’s a slow bowler, then it can be considered otherwise. I am no way including misbehaving wickets like Delhi Ferozshah Kotla. If only UDRS is brought in to make the correct decision; it did not work wonders there. Of course, technology alone did not play spoil sport against us, our fielding added to the woes. Kohli dropped a tough chance, but then chances that come our way do need to be cashed in.

Our Batting is going from strength to strength and Dhoni would be glad that Yuvraj is amongst the runs too. Sachin was simply outstanding, as he built the innings, giving the bowlers due respect in initial overs. It all started when Collingwood came into the attack to slip in few run saving overs. But then real intention was to provide split of 10 overs, suppose if one of Strauss’ five bowlers leaked runs. Sachin counter-attacked Collingwood and sent a message to Strauss that he has to compulsorily rely on five bowlers picked for the match. Luckily for Strauss, Bresnan came up with one of the best performance of English fast bowler in a world cup 5-48. Yardy bowled well, especially in the death overs along with Bresnan. Anderson had a bad day at the office. Sachin reserves his best for the world cup matches and it was one of special innings from Maestro. Gambhir is consistent and that’s good news.

Kevin Pietersen started the innings with audacity. He was dancing down to our fast bowling duo and attacked from the word go. Strauss was provided the option to play second fiddle to Pietersen. But then he chose his own way of pacing the innings. A boundary in each over and rotating the strike for remaining, was fantastic to watch. Kevin Pietersen was shocked to find Munaf holding onto the catch to one of his fierce straight drive and hardly he knew that Munaf himself was shocked. Jokes apart, it was a fantastic reflex catch from Munaf. Trott looked good but then Piyush got through his defense. Bell and Strauss partnership would have won the match for England, but for 3rd Power play. Both the captains were not happy with the tie, as they had chances to be on the winning side.

India has to provide chance for Nehra and Ashwin to build a perfect bowling mix before Quarter final match. Dhoni made open statement that India fielding can’t improve much, as we have too many slow fielders in our squad and we have the talent in our bowling unit to come up with better performance. He is definitely a captain who knows the limitation of his team, but focuses his mind to work heavily on the positives. Probably Luck also favours this guy for the same reason.

At this point, Indian batting unit is tremendously strong, but it would be helpful if we chase down few targets in forthcoming matches before elimination stage, just so that we are prepared to face two edged sword. Ideally, it should happen against big teams, say South Africa or West Indies or both matches.

Go India Go,

Regards,
Prashy.

6 comments:

  1. my idea of India's bowling attack if they are planning to go with a 2-2(pace/spin)then they must pick Ashwin in....Zaheer and Ashwin must open the bowling...it will work wonders(Sidhu had the same views the other day)...cos I believe in India a left arm pacer along with a right arm off-spinner will click the red button for the opponents(Ashwin has been in this position in many a times for CSK-am not comparing T20 with ODIs but he candle pressure very well)...do not know what Dhoni is thinking but he is a smart captain and I back him thoroughly with his decisions...I wish all the best for the coming matches!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. @MDR - Sachin, Kirsten, Sehwag and Dhoni are the key for selecting 11 for a match. There is enough experience there to think rationally before picking the team. Piyush Chawla is picked in Bangalore, cause he ran through Australian side in warm up match at the same venue. Now we can't criticize him after one bad performance. It almost cost us the match, but then it alone did not put the team in deadlock scenario.

    I agree that Ashwin and Zaheer opening combination will work wonders for our bowling line up. Be it T-20 or ODI, bowling in Power play when the restrictions are there, calls for some talent. Ashwin has proved that he possesses it. He should wait for his chance and unlike Sreesanth, he should not go hard and take it easy and grab the opportunity.

    Even for Sreesanth, its not the end of the world cup, as he might be called on again to deliver.

    Ya, lets back Dhoni and India, cause we can correct all our loopholes before we hit the elimination rounds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Prashy:
    Nice Article. Agree with you completely, The batsmen were one notch above and Most bowlers were clueless. With both our Strike bowlers (Nehra and PK) unavailable, the responsibility is on the shoulders of Zaheer. No doubt performed better in late overs. In my opinion the turning point of the match was zaheer's 43rd over and Piyush's 44th over, Both these overs created pressure in opponent ranks which led to their fall. Coming to the 49th over, I don't think Dhoni made a mistake. He typically did what his predecessor's did. Piyush in my opinion was right choice but the mistake was that Piyush bowled from around which was easier for the batsmen, The last ball of the over was a wicket which he bowled from around. Dhoni made a similar decision agaisnt Victoria in champions league T20. Dhoni gave super over to Ashwin and David hussey tore Ashwin apart, So The match exposed the weaknesses and Team INDIA should learn and capitulate the strengths and work on weaknesses. Sachin & Strauss were above all today and Strauss deserves Man of the MATCH for his inspirational knock.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Venkat - That was a nice memory from you regarding Ashwin's super over against David Hussey. My personal take is, its really harsh on spinner to bowl during the times, where the batsmen have the luxury to whallop each and every delivery.

    Bresnan and Swann were pushed to play aggressive shots due to the required run rate being very high. Its more like a scenario, where a bowler bowls a 'free hit' delivery. Imagine six balls of an over being that way. Thats why couple of shots, they connected and one ball Piyush succeeded. Its a fair chance for both the parties.

    Be it Over the wicket or around the wicket, I personally feel it wont play much of a part as the batsmen is trying to hit you out of the ground. If you observe, Dhoni pushed Chawla to bowl from around the wicket. Piyush is not experienced enough to bowl dot balls by not giving enough room. He was bowling too quick so that he does not have time to swing the bat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What would be ideal Batting or Chasing based on the performance agaisnt Bangladesh and England for INDIA

    ReplyDelete
  6. @venkat - With this batting line up, We can chase any score which is close to 330. But against teams like Australia and South africa, we can chase anything close to 280 and nothing beyond. There is a definite necessity for yusuf Pathan and Yuvi to play match winning knocks on those occassion. Dhoni has to bat through till the last run to be scored. Yusuf Pathan, for all we know, might not get chance at all in setting scores for us. But when we chase, suddenly he becomes the main man. I feel that.

    ReplyDelete